Provisional answer to paper D2 2026
Dear all,
Here is our provisional answer to paper D2. We found it a reasonable paper.
As always, your comments are valued.
Paper D2 2026
[001] Today is 3
March 2026. Our company Crystal Clear, based in Germany, is engaged in the business
of glass panels. These glass panels can be used for any application but are particularly
useful in solar panels.
[002] Glass was first
made in the ancient world and Egyptian glass beads are the earliest glass objects
known, dating from about 2500 BCE. Conventional glass and large glass panels
made therefrom with flat surfaces were described in a review article published
over 30 years ago.
[003] Conventional
glass is suitable for making glass panels for everyday use, such as simple window
glass. However, when used in solar panels, the glass panels show cracks and
turn opaque after a few years.
[004] After extensive
experimentation, we developed a new compound A. When glass
Comprises compound A,
the resulting glass panels are surprisingly more resilient, making them
especially suitable for solar panels. This effect was described in German
patent application DE-CC that we filed on 20 January 2025. DE-CC additionally
describes and claims A. A cannot be obtained by using common general knowledge.
The process for obtaining A was not described in DE-CC. We withdrew DE-CC a
month after filing.
[005] On 28 February
2025, we filed European patent application EP-CC, claiming priority from DE-CC.
The description discloses glass comprising compound B. The description also
discloses that when glass comprises B, the amount of energy generated by a
solar panel comprising a glass panel made of such glass is surprisingly
increased. Independently, EP-CC discloses compound A, glass comprising A, and
the effect of A on the resilience of the resulting glass panels. EP-CC further
describes a process
for obtaining B and the process for obtaining A, as well as methods
for producing glass
panels comprising B and/or A. EP-CC has the following claims: Claim 1 relates to
glass comprising B; Claim 2 relates to glass comprising B and A; Claim 3
relates to a glass panel
made of the glass of
claim 1; Claim 4 relates to a glass panel made of the glass of claim 2. The European
search report only cites a scientific article disclosing B as an anti-oxidant
in food and a process for obtaining B. The search opinion is positive.
[006] In May 2025, we
sent a brochure to several companies producing solar panels, with a view to attracting
potential customers. This brochure discloses A, the process for obtaining it,
and glass comprising A.
[007] As a result, we
were contacted by potential clients from all over the world, and we
Therefore filed a
third patent application PCT-CC-A on 19 January 2026. PCT-CC-A contains the
disclosure of DE-CC in its entirety. The description further discloses the
process for obtaining A. PCT-CC-A claims priority from DE-CC and has two
claims. Claim 1 is directed to compound A and claim 2 to glass comprising A.
[008] Another way to
increase the resilience of the glass panels is by making panels with a V-shaped
corrugated surface, instead of the flat surface which is commonly used. Our
Researchers found out
that panels with a V-shaped corrugated surface are surprisingly more resilient
than panels with a flat surface. On 2 July 2023, we filed a PCT application,
PCT-CC-V, without claiming priority.
PCT-CC-V contains the
results of our research and also discloses and claims a glass panel with a
V-shaped corrugated surface (V). These glass panels can be produced by
conventional processes.
The necessary PCT
fees were paid upon filing. No further action has been taken since
Receipt of the search
report drawn up by the EPO together with a positive written opinion that only mentioned
the well-known flat surfaces.
[009] Our Japanese
competitor Garasu Paneru has also done some research on the effect of the surface
of glass panels on the resilience. On 13 December 2023, Garasu Paneru filed an
EP patent application EP-GP with three claims. Claim 1 relates to a glass panel
with a corrugated surface.
Claim 2 depends on
claim 1 and relates to a glass panel with a V-shaped corrugated
Surface (V). Claim 3
depends on claim 1 and relates to a glass panel with a U-shaped corrugated surface
(U). All of these glass panels can be produced by conventional processes. EP-GP
claims priority from, and is a translation into English of, JP-GP, which was
filed by Garasu Paneru on 13 September 2023.
[010] In July 2025,
we filed third-party observations against EP-GP, citing the glass panels with a
U-shaped corrugated surface that Garasu Paneru showed at a US national
exhibition (Translucent Visions) on the island of Hawaii in August 2023. Some
of our employees went to this exhibition and prepared a report, which included
photos of the glass panels shown. Our arguments regarding the lack of novelty
of claims 1 and 3 were submitted to the EPO, but we regrettably forgot to attach
the report as evidence. EP-GP was granted without amendments. The mention of
the grant was published
on 10 December 2025.
[011] Garasu Paneru
has been manufacturing glass panels with a U-shape corrugated surface and glass
panels with a V-shape corrugated surface in Japan since October 2025. These
glass panels are sold in Europe, and last week we learnt that the glass of
these panels comprises A.
[012] We are now
ready to manufacture glass panels with a U-shape corrugated surface and glass panels
with a V-shape corrugated surface in Europe. The glass of our panels comprises
A and B.
We will sell these
panels to several clients in Europe.
1. Outline the patent
situation as it currently stands for the claims of the following
applications:
(a) EP-CC
Filed on 28 Feb 2025 claiming priority from
DE-CC filed on 20 Jan 2025
Status: pending; will be published in June
2026.
Effective date of claims:
All 4 claims of EP-CC contain feature B.
Feature B is not disclosed in DE-CC.
Therefore, although EP-CC was filed by same
applicant, well before expiry of 12m priority period, priority is not valid as
the claims do not relate to the same invention.
The effective date of all claims is the
filing date: 28 Feb. 2025
Claim 1 is directed to glass comprising B.
Patentability of claim 1
EP-CC describes how to make glass with B.
It is also known how to make compound B, so claim is enabled.
Prior art
Scientific article discl. B (cited in
search report)
US national exhibition in Hawaii (Aug 2023)
PCT-CC-V - published 18m after filing;
2/7/23 + 18m -->2/1/2025, so if 54(2) prior art
Art 54(3) prior right:
EP-GP - published 18m after prio; 13/9/23 +
18m -->13/3/2025
So EP-GP has priority date 13/9/23 before
effective date claim 1 EP-CC but was
published after, and is a European
application, so it is art. 54(3) prior right, relevant
for novelty only
Novelty
US national exhibition:
Glass panels with U-shaped corrugated
surfaces were displayed, but no disclosure of B, so claim 1 novel over this
disclosure
PCT-CC-V:
Only discloses glass panels with corrugated
surfaces in V shape and U shape;
does not disclose B, so claim 1 novel over
PCT-CC-V
EP-GP:
Does not disclose B, so glass comprising B
is novel over EP-GP
The scientific article is the only document
to disclose B, but only as an anti-oxidant; not in combination with glass.
Therefore claim 1 EP-CC is novel over all
prior art.
Inventive step
B has the surprising effect of increasing
energy generated by a panel made of the glass, so is also inventive.
Claim 1 can lead to valid patent protection
for G+B in European states where validated.
Claim 2 is directed to Glass + B + A
This is CC's first application for G + B +
A, so effective date of claim 1 is 28/2/2028
Patentability of claim 2
EP-CC describes how to make glass with B +
A.
A process for obtaining A is also
disclosed, which is not part of the skilled person’s common general knowledge, so
claim 2 is enabled.
Dependent claim 2 is novel and inventive
for same reasons as claim 1, and is additionally novel and inventive as none of
the prior art documents disclose A, which has the additional technical effect of
improving resilience.
Valid patent protection can be obtained for
G + A + B
Claim 3 directed to a panel made of G + B and
claim 4 directed to a glass panel made
of G+A+B are therefore also novel and inventive.
NB: The process for making A, A itself and G+A
are disclosed, but not claimed in EP-CC, although the sjm is patentable (see
improvements).
EP-CC can lead to a validly granted patent
giving protection in EP states where validated for G + A; G + B + A and panels
made of G+A and of G+A+B.
(b) PCT-CC-A
Filed on 19 Jan 2026 by CC claiming
priority from DE-CC filed on 20 Jan 2025
Status: pending; will be published in late
June 2026
Claim 1 is directed to compound A. Claim 2
is directed to Glass with A (G+A).
Compound A and its effect when added to a
glass panel are disclosed in DE-CC and PCT-CC-A was filed before the 12m period
of DE-CC expired on 20 Jan 2026 (Tue) by same applicant.
However, DE-CC does not contain a
disclosure of how to make A. This was not part of
common general knowledge, so compound A is
not disclosed in an enabling manner.
Consequently, priority cannot be validly
claimed from DE-CC and the effective date of claim 1 and claim 2 of PCT-CC-A is
19 Jan 2026.
Prior art
DE-CC discloses A, but has been withdrawn,
so will not be published and is not prior art.
EP-CC discloses A and panels with A, but
will not be published until July 2026, so is
not full prior art.
But it has an earlier effective date and if
PCT-CC-A enters EP-phase, it will be 54(3) prior art, relevant for assessment
of novelty only.
The brochure sent to potential customers in
May 2025 is full prior art.
The brochure discloses A and G + A and is
novelty-destroying for claim 1 and claim 2. The brochure also provides an
enabling disclosure of how to make A, although this is no longer needed for
eligibility to serve as prior art (before the EPO).
EP-CC also contains an enabling disclosure
of A and G +A and will destroy the novelty of claims 1 and 2 if PCT-CC-A enter
the EP phase
At present, PCT-CC-A cannot lead to valid patent
protection for A and G + A.
(c) PCT-CC-V
CC's first application for glass panels
with V-shaped corrugated surface: V.
Claim is directed to V and has effective
date: 2 July 2023.
Previously, only flat glass panels were
known, so claim is novel.
ISR from EPO was positive and no earlier
disclosures are known,
Claim is also inventive as V-shaped surface
has surprising effect of improving resilience of glass panels.
Status: 30m period ends 2 Jan 2026.
The time limit to enter the JP phase has
expired.
The 31m period to enter EP phase has also
expired - on 2 Feb. 2026
At present there is no protection for
panels with V-shaped surface.
(d) EP-GP
Filed on 13 Dec 2023 claiming priority of
JP-GP filed on 13 Sept. 2023.
Status: granted on 10 Dec. 2025
JP-GP is GP's 1st application to disclose
panel with corrugated surface wherein the corrugations are V-shaped or
U-shaped.
EP-GP was filed well within the priority
period, by the same applicant and is a translation of the JP priority
application, so relates the same invention.
Claim 1 directed to panel + corrugated
surface, Claim 2 directed to V-shaped and claim 3 directed to U-shaped
corrugations validly claim priority and the effective date of all claims is 13
Sept. 2023.
Prior art
The exhibition in the Hawaii in Aug. 23
occurred earlier and the disclosure of panels with U-shaped corrugations is
full prior art and destroys the novelty of claims 1 and 3.
U-shaped corrugations are a species of
corrugations and the public disclosure destroys the novelty of claim 1.
If PCT-CC-V were to enter the EP phase, it
has an earlier effective date and will have been published later in Jan 2025,
and would be novelty destroying Art. 54(3) prior art.
But PCT-CC-V has not entered, so claim 2 is
novel over known flat panels and also over the exhibition disclosure, as V-shaped
were not shown.
EP-GP has been granted, but has not been
validly granted.
2. As the
situation currently stands:
(a) Is Crystal
Clear free to produce and sell its glass panels in Europe?
The panels with U-shaped and V-shaped
corrugations that CC wants to produce and sell in Europe fall under the scope
of the granted claims in EP-GP.
Under a presumption of validity, the
products would infringe this patent.
EP-GP claim 1 is currently in force, and
can be used to stop CC from manufacturing or
selling (or offering for sale, importing,
storing) glass panels with any shape of corrugated
surface in Europe, in any countries in
which EP-GP is validated.
Especially Germany and other Group-1 London
agreement countries where validation is automatic
So at the moment, CC is not free to produce
or sell their glass panels with U-shape or V-shape
(b) Is Garasu
Paneru free to produce its glass panels in Japan and sell its glass panels in Europe?
At present there is no IP that blocks GP
from manufacturing or selling its panels in Japan.
EP-CC has not been published yet, so gives
no protection at the moment. In any case the panels being sold in EP comprise
compound A only. EP CC will give protection for panels with B only or B in
combination with A, so will not be infringed.
PCT-CC-V has not entered any national phase
and PCT-CC-A has not been published and at present the claims are not novel
over the prior art.
There are also no IP rights that block GP
in Europe, so they are free.
3. What can
Crystal Clear do to improve their position?
PCT-CC-V - enter EP phase
As mentioned, Euro-PCT-CC-V is deemed
withdrawn because entry acts of R. 159(1) were not performed before 31m period
expired.
This can be remedied with further
processing.
The time limit is 2m from notification a
loss of rights communication from the EPO.
No information that such a communication
has been received, so 2m time limit is probably still running. There is no need
to wait for the communication.
Even if it has been issued, we are within
2m from expiry of the 31m period so still in time to request FP.
Complete the omitted acts: pay filing fee,
pay examination fee and designation fee + 50% extra as FP fee.
File written request for examination and
pay flat FP fee.
The renewal fee for the 3rd year was also
due at 31m, as this date later than R. 51(1) date.
This can still be paid within 6m from
expiry 31 m period + 50% surcharge
2/2/26 + 6m --> 2/8/26
Effect: granted patent protection for
Panels with V-shaped corrugated surface can be
obtained in EP states where validated
PCT-CC-V becomes novelty-destroying 54(3)
prior art for claim 2 of EP-GP.
Further improvements.
Enter A.S.A.P, waive R. 161/162
communication and request accelerated prosecution to get fast grant.
After grant, validate at least in EP
countries where GP has been selling.
Prior to grant, establish provisional
protection in such states by complying with the relevant national requirements.
GP has been selling panels with V-shaped
corrugations and will be liable for reasonable
Compensation as from date of provisional
protection.
Japan
The 30m period to enter JP phase has lapsed.
I will consult with a colleague in Japan about possibilities for late entry.
EP-GP
EP-GP granted on 10 Dec. 2025 - file
opposition
The 9m period does not expire until 10
Sept. 2026, so plenty of time.
Pay opposition fee.
Oppose all 3 claims on the ground of lack
of novelty.
Include report and evidence from the third
party observations that were forgotten
Exhibition in Hawaii destroys novelty of
claims 1 and 3 of EP-GP
Also cite Euro-PCT-CC-V, which destroys
novelty of claims 1 and 2 of EP-GP
Likely outcome: EP-GP will be revoked.
You will then be free to sell your panels
and manufacture them in DE.
PCT-CC-A - add priority claim
EP-CC discloses A , process for making A and
a glass panel with A.
EP-CC describes how to make compound A and
is CC’s first application for the process, It is also the first application to
provide an enabling disclosure of A and G+A.
PCT-CC-A claim 1 and 2 are directed to this
same invention.
It was filed within 12m of EP-CC by same
applicant, so priority can be validly claimed.
The time limit to add the declaration of
priority, which can be submitted to the IB or EPO as rO is later of 4m from PCT
filing date or 16m from earliest priority
4m period expires on 19 May 2026
16m expires: 20/01/2025 + 16m -->
20/05/2026
20 May 2026 is last day, so still plenty of
time.
Effect of adding priority claim: effective date of claims in PCT-CC-A becomes
28 Feb. 2025
The exhibition in US is then no longer
prior art and claims 1 and 2 are novel.
EP-CC is also prevented from becoming
novelty-destroying 54(3) prior art.
The surprising effect of improved
resilience supports inventive step and granted patent
protection can be obtained for A and G+A.
Further improvements: request early publication.
Perform early entry in JP to block
manufacture of U-shaped and V-shaped panels with A
Enter EP early as well to block sales of
panel with A in Europe.
Upon entry to EP, add a claim to the process,
which has not yet been claimed, and establish provisional protection in EP
states where GP is selling panels with compound A.
After grant, their sale of U-shaped panels
+ A will infringe Euro-PCT-CC-A.
The sale of V-shaped panels will infringe Euro-PCT-CC-
A and V.
Alternatively, to get protection in Europe
for A:
Do not enter EP phase and
File a divisional application from EP-CC
with claims directed to the process for making A, compound A itself and G+A.
This subject matter has not been searched
in EP-CC and is non-unitary, so a divisional is necessary.
After filing, request early publication and
establish provisional protection in EP states where GP is selling.
EP-CC
To get a grant a.s.a.p. request early
publication, pay fee for examination and designation fee, request PACE.
After grant, valid in EP states which are
important markets for glass panels.
At the moment, GP is not using compound B
in its products, but there is currently no IP rights which protect panels with
B only.
What about filing a divisional from EP-CC instead of adding a priority claim to PCT-CC-A? More expensive, and no rights in JP, but other than that it seems possible?
ReplyDeleteI also went with the divisional option as I didn’t believe priority could be claimed from EP-CC as it was the second application for the subject matter, and DE-CC had already served as a priority application, so EP-CC could never serve as a priority application for any subject matter disclosed in DE-CC. I’m guessing the fact that because the subject matter in DE-CC was not enabled then it could not serve as a priority application in the first place so therefore was not the first application for the subject matter.
DeleteApart from that, my answer seems fairly similar to the one posted above so not too unhappy.
Yes I thought the same! And since G1/23 enablement is no longer an issue for a product per se to be considered disclosed in prior art. I assumed that along the same line of reasoning compound A was disclosed in DE-CC and we could not simply disregard it
DeleteI argued that it's possible to withdraw the priority claim of EP-CC, because it's the first application for subject-matter B and B+A, and then file JP-CC by claiming priority from EP-CC.
DeleteI could be completely wrong here. But I thought withdrawing EP-CC’s priority to DE-CC was irrelevant as because DE-CC had already acted as a priority application then no subsequent application could ever be a first filing for the subject matter in DE-CC, irrespective of whether a priority claim to it was removed in the future or not.
DeleteBut back to the point about non-enablement… I think DE-CC could never actually serve as a priority application so any claim to priority to DE-CC is irrelevant because it’s by default not a valid claim to priority.
I could be wrong, but EP-CC's subject-matter is completely different from DE-CC's subject-matter anyway. EP-CC is the first filing for B, B+A, B+G and B+A+G. I think what you said would only be relevant if a subsequent application claimed A or A+G
DeleteG1/23 is only relevant for Art 54(2) EPC. It does not remove the requirement of Art. 83 that an EP application should contain an enabling disclosure. There is also no indication that it should affect the application of Art. 87(1).
DeleteOur reasoning is that because DE-CC does not contain an enabling disclosure of A, it is not the 1st application for A. Therefore, EP-CC is actually the 1st application and it can serve as a priority right for PCT-CC-A.
Withdrawal of p-claim to DE-CC
If DE-CC really had been the client's first application for A, then EP-CC could never have been considered as the 1st application under the exception of 87(4). J is correct.
I gave all improvements like Deltapatent + to file a DIV from EP-CC to claim the method for producing A. Even though it may not have been necessary.
ReplyDeleteRegarding question 1, in the FR paper, it seems to me that the translation had been submitted in French. Can anyone confirm?
ReplyDelete(sorry it was mean for D1, wrong post!)
DeleteRegarding EP‑GP claim V, I have also noted that it lacks inventive step when starting from the disclosure of the U‑panels shown in the exhibition. There is no technical effect associated with using U instead of V, and the manufacturing process appears to be conventional.
ReplyDeleteYes, valid comment
DeleteAbout the US exhibition in Hawaii where Garasu exhibited their U shaped corrugated glass panels, considering that last week we were informed that Garasu glass panels also comprise A, should not be considered as prior art for glass panels comprising A? And that Garasu could this exhibition also to demonstrate that use of A in glases was prior art for CC panels? Or should we assume that incorporating A was solely a new feature since 2025?
ReplyDeleteI think if the panels shown in Hawaii had contained A, that is information that must be specifically given.
Delete